BALTIMORE, Md. – This week, Maryland Attorney General Brian E. Frosh joined a coalition of 23 states and cities in filing comments in support of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) proposal to reaffirm that it is “appropriate and necessary” under the federal Clean Air Act to regulate mercury and other toxic air pollution from coal- and oil-fired power plants. That determination, first made over 20 years ago, is the basis for the 2012 Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS Rule), a landmark rule that has substantially reduced emissions of especially dangerous pollutants that threaten some of our most vulnerable communities, including children and historically marginalized communities.
EPA’s plan reverses an unlawful Trump administration rule from 2020 that withdrew EPA’s longstanding determination underpinning the MATS Rule and restores the agency’s prior finding. In comments filed with EPA, the coalition agrees with EPA’s proposal to revoke the 2020 rule, which lacked a reasoned basis and created a serious threat to public health. The comments point out that the MATS Rule has led to huge reductions in emissions of toxic pollutants that would otherwise expose communities to dirtier air and mercury-contaminated fish.
“Breathing mercury and other toxic emissions is dangerous for every single one of us. Toxic emissions are harmful to the environment and ultimately find their way into the food chain,” said Attorney General Frosh. “The Trump administration’s actions put our health and safety at grave risk. EPA’s proposal will restore protections from these most dangerous chemicals.
Industry compliance with the MATS Rule has resulted in massive reductions in emissions of hazardous air pollutants including acid gases, mercury, and other toxic metals such as arsenic, chromium, and nickel. Since the Rule was implemented, power-plant mercury emissions declined by 91 percent between 2010 and 2020, and acid gas and non-mercury metal emissions declined by 96 and 81 percent, respectively, between 2010 and 2017. Exposure to those toxins causes serious human health harms, such as pulmonary and cardiovascular disease, neurological injury, and cancer, and devastates wildlife and aquatic ecosystems.
The coalition point out that the industry is in full compliance with the MATS Rule, which is providing enormous health, environmental, and economic benefits to the residents of their states and local governments—and at a fraction of the predicted cost and with little effect on electricity prices or reliability. EPA’s proposal estimates that the Rule’s mercury reductions are providing hundreds of millions of dollars a year in direct benefits across the U.S. population; however, those substantial benefits are only a small portion of the Rule’s total benefits because most of the adverse health and ecological harms the rule prevents are not readily quantifiable. In addition to effectively controlling mercury and other toxic metals, like arsenic and chromium, MATS has led to a dramatic reduction in the fine particulate matter emitted by power plants. Fine particulate matter is the largest environmental health risk factor in the country and is linked to premature death, aggravated asthma, chronic bronchitis, and other cardiopulmonary illnesses that disproportionately affect many historically marginalized communities.
The MATS Rule represents the culmination of more than two decades of study and rulemaking by the EPA and was triggered by Congress’s 1990 amendments to the Clean Air Act. In 2000, the EPA determined that it was “appropriate and necessary” to regulate hazardous pollutants emitted from fossil-fuel-fired plants that are harmful to human and wildlife health. The agency found that fossil-fuel-fired power plants are the country’s largest source of hazardous air pollution, and that other existing provisions of the Clean Air Act would not adequately address those dangerous emissions. EPA reaffirmed that finding in 2012, relying on a growing body of scientific evidence.
In 2016, following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Michigan v. EPA, EPA issued a supplemental finding reaffirming once again that it is “appropriate” to regulate power plant emissions when the costs of regulation are considered. In 2020, the Trump-era EPA reversed course, purporting to rescind that determination based on an incorrect interpretation of the Clean Air Act and in reliance on stale, inaccurate information that overstated the actual costs and vastly underestimated the benefits of reducing power plant air pollution.
Today’s comments commend EPA for once again recognizing that overwhelming scientific evidence demonstrates that the enormous health and environmental benefits of the MATS Rule far outweigh the costs of compliance.
In July 2020, Attorney General Frosh joined states, counties, and cities in filing a lawsuit against the EPA over its unlawful attempt to rescind its longstanding decision that regulation of toxic power-plant emissions was appropriate and necessary.
Joining Attorney General Frosh in today’s comments are the attorneys general of California, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin, as well as the the cities of Baltimore, Chicago, and New York City.