WALDORF, Md. – In early May, officers assigned to the Patrol Division were made aware of a case in which a manager of a business in Waldorf was stealing large amounts of money.
The closing manager was suspected of stealing cash from the business over the past several months. As part of the investigation, several search warrants were obtained.
On May 15, patrol officers, with assistance from the Criminal Investigations Division, arrested the suspect as he left work. Over $6,000 in currency was recovered from him, and an additional $25,000 was recovered from his residence.
Preliminarily, more than $100,000 appears to have been stolen. Nicholas Owen Patton, age 44, of Waldorf, was charged with felony theft scheme. On May 16, a district court commissioner released Patton from the Charles County Detention Center on personal recognizance. PFC Gould is investigating.
The CCSO was accredited by the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies, Inc. (CALEA) in 2001 and has since earned the highest rating of Excellence. Established in 1658, the CCSO is one of the oldest law enforcement agencies in the United States. For more information, visit www.ccso.us.
Charles County Crime Solvers offers rewards of up to $1,000 for information that leads to the arrest or indictment of a person responsible for a crime in Charles County. All individuals who provide tips through Crime Solvers will remain anonymous. Anyone with information about an unsolved crime or the location of a fugitive may contact Charles County Crime Solvers by calling 1-866-411-TIPS.
Tips can also be submitted online at www.charlescountycrimesolvers.com or by using the P3Intel mobile app, which can be found in the Android Store and Apple Store by searching P3tips. For more information about the P3 program, click on this link: www.p3intel.com.
What business was he stealing from? Seems that would be an important piece of information.
He was stealing from a Target store.
That’s what I wanted to know as well, but when info like that is not released, it’s because an investigation is still ongoing.
Looks like “the business” paid off someone to not disclose the business name, or the reporter doesn’t know what good reporting is.